Can you see a real report first?
A sample report should show the section order, photo structure, measurements, assumptions, and how constraints are written up.
A practical way to judge a renewable survey provider before you rely on them for heat pump, solar PV, heat loss, EPC, or battery work.
The question is not whether somebody can visit the property. The question is whether the report helps your team quote, design, and install without rebuilding the job afterwards.
These are the checks that matter before the first live job. If a provider is weak on these, the risk usually lands with the office, designer, or installer later.
A sample report should show the section order, photo structure, measurements, assumptions, and how constraints are written up.
Heat pump survey, ASHP survey, solar PV survey, heat loss, EPC, and battery checks should not be blurred into one vague promise.
Guide pricing should be visible before booking, with the final quote confirmed after postcode, property, travel, and scope are checked.
Weak evidence should be called out clearly. A report that hides unknowns just moves the risk into design or install.
The provider should be clear about survey report delivery, EPC timing where in scope, and when heat loss work follows.
The report should be useful to the people quoting, the people designing, and the people fitting the system.
Reviews, sample reports, and case studies help you judge the standard before giving a provider live customer work.
Check siting, access, plant, electrical evidence, heat loss links, and report structure.
Check MCS 020(a) inputs, unit siting, existing heating, room evidence, and booking scope.
Check roof evidence, shading, usable area, access, electrical route, inverter context, and battery notes.
Check PV design handover, cable route, array constraints, inverter position, and battery-ready detail.
Check measured versus assumed inputs, desktop suitability, fabric assumptions, and room-by-room output clarity.
Use the company overview if you need one provider across heat pump, solar, heat loss, EPC, and battery routes.
Use these when you are comparing providers for one specific route and need a sharper set of checks.
Report proof, siting, heat loss, electrical evidence, QA, turnaround, and pricing checks.
Roof, access, shading, inverter, cable route, battery-ready, and report QA checks.
Measured inputs, assumptions, desktop route suitability, and room-by-room output checks.
The evidence to capture before solar PV design and quote assumptions become fixed.
Check the sample report, pricing route, turnaround promise, QA process, service scope, how missing evidence is handled, and whether the report is usable by office, design, and install teams.
Because the site visit only helps if the next team can use the output. A weak report format creates callbacks even when the surveyor captured useful evidence.
Yes. The final quote still depends on scope, property, travel, and extras, but guide pricing should be visible before booking so the installer can qualify the job properly.