Skip to main content
ASHP guide

Air source heat pump calculator: inputs before output

Calculator outputs are only as good as the evidence behind them. Survey quality decides whether the numbers hold up on site.

MCS says compliant heat-load work for heat pumps is room by room. That is why missing room data, weak U-values, or vague emitter notes can make a neat-looking output unusable. · 3 min read

Inputs that make ASHP outputs usable

What strong looks like

Capture standards

  • Room-by-room dimensions and exposure captured with supporting context
  • Emitter condition and layout documented before sizing decisions
  • Plant location, access routes, and constraints photographed clearly
  • Assumptions recorded so design teams know what is confirmed vs pending
Where time is lost

Where teams lose time

  • Missing evidence around emitters and routing
  • Assumptions buried in ad-hoc notes
  • No consistent move from survey to design
Why it helps

Why teams use Vertex

  • Clearer reports for office and design
  • Faster quoting with less chasing
  • Install teams start with clearer site context
  • Portal visibility across teams and roles

What the MCS heat-load guidance expects the inputs to cover

Room by room

MCS says room-by-room heat-load calculations are important for sizing low-carbon heating properly. A whole-house shortcut is not the same standard.

Core variables

The MCS documentation points back to building fabric, room dimensions, air-change rates, target internal temperatures, and winter design temperatures as key inputs.

Practical implication

If any of those inputs are guessed badly, the calculator still gives a number. It is just a weaker number. That is why survey quality matters more than the interface.

Sources checked on 17 April 2026: MCS Heat Load Calculator, MCS heat-loss guidance, and MCS room schema. The third card is an inference from those sources plus normal survey practice.