Skip to main content
Evaluation page

Traditional surveys vs Vertex

For installer teams comparing suppliers, this is the practical difference in workflow quality and handoff usability.

Designed for consistent delivery across repeat installs nationwide.

How the output model differs

Traditional survey approach Vertex renewable survey system
Generic inspection formGeneral form logic, not built around renewable install workflow. Purpose-built renewable systemCapture model designed for ASHP, solar and heat-loss handoff requirements.
Linear PDF exportTeams scroll and search for critical constraints. Structured navigationTeams jump directly to electrics, cylinder, siting, heat-loss and photos.
Data capture focusEvidence exists but can be hard to use quickly. Installer workflow packEvidence grouped by technical decision point for office, design and install teams.
Variable structureOutput quality can shift between jobs and surveyors. Standardised outputRepeatable architecture and internal QC checks before release.
Slow internal reviewMore time spent finding details and resolving redesign questions. Cleaner workflowFaster quoting, fewer redesign questions, and less time searching documents.

This is why growing installers standardise on structured documentation architecture, not ad-hoc exports.

Switch with low risk

No lock-in

No lock-in contracts required to test the workflow.

Trial first job

Run one live job and judge pack structure in your own process.

Clear before booking

Scope, lead time and pricing are confirmed before booking.