Skip to main content
Case study (anonymised, live data)

ASHP survey case study: detached house with wet UFH

A real survey pack from North Yorkshire showing how room-level UFH evidence reduces design re-questions.

This page uses live Vertex survey data and real survey photos with personal details removed. No customer name, address, or identifying location data is shown.

What was captured on this survey

Installer-focused evidence from one detached-house ASHP survey, delivered in a structured handoff format.

17Rooms assessed
7Rooms flagged with wet UFH
12 / 28Radiator / window entries
Single phaseSupply with 100A main fuse, 2 spare ways
Cylinder presentThermostat + single-rate immersion recorded
4m / 12mDistance to consumer unit / cylinder
Wet UFH rooms

Entrance Hall, Living Room, Utility Room, Kitchen, Dining Room, Lounge, and WC.

Handoff readiness

Room-by-room data, floor plans, electrical evidence, and service photos were all captured in one survey workflow.

Selected anonymised survey images

Real survey photos used in the case study. Identifying details were removed before publication.

How this helps before design and quotation

Emitter strategy

Seven rooms were already flagged as wet UFH, while radiator entries remained visible in other spaces. That avoids assumptions when planning mixed emitter layouts.

Electrical confidence

Supply phase, fuse rating, spare ways, and clear CU/cutout photos were captured in one pass, reducing avoidable return visits for electrical clarification.

Handoff speed

The pack combined floor plans, room records, and photo evidence in a single structure, helping office, design, and install teams work from the same survey narrative.

Scope boundary

Final heat loss calculation method, system sizing, and detailed design decisions remain with the installer unless separately commissioned.

More examples and next steps