Capture standards
- Room-by-room dimensions and construction context
- Evidence-backed assumptions instead of defaults
- Explicit recording of unknowns requiring follow-up
- Clear outputs usable by office and design teams
Formula debates are secondary when survey inputs are weak. Strong evidence reduces rework and protects install schedules.
4.7/5 on Trustpilot · report and organised photos in the portal on completion · EPC by next morning in the standard flow.
The basic heat loss relationship is simple; the risk is in the inputs. A clean survey makes each assumption visible enough for the next person to challenge or approve.
Room heat loss is driven by fabric loss, ventilation loss, temperature difference, and room dimensions. The formula is only useful when the survey data behind those parts is reliable.
The survey should show where U-value assumptions came from, whether insulation evidence exists, and which areas need conservative assumptions because proof is missing.
Room boundaries, ceiling heights, open-plan areas, extensions, and unheated adjoining spaces need to be clear. A small input error can change the emitter or heat pump conversation.
Ventilation, design temperature, room target temperature, fabric assumptions, and unknown areas should be recorded in the report rather than hidden in a spreadsheet.